PortfoliosLab logo
^IXIC vs. BZ=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^IXIC and BZ=F is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

^IXIC vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^IXIC:

0.55

BZ=F:

-0.75

Sortino Ratio

^IXIC:

1.06

BZ=F:

-0.91

Omega Ratio

^IXIC:

1.15

BZ=F:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

^IXIC:

0.68

BZ=F:

-0.36

Martin Ratio

^IXIC:

2.24

BZ=F:

-1.38

Ulcer Index

^IXIC:

7.41%

BZ=F:

15.46%

Daily Std Dev

^IXIC:

26.01%

BZ=F:

28.29%

Max Drawdown

^IXIC:

-77.93%

BZ=F:

-86.77%

Current Drawdown

^IXIC:

-5.26%

BZ=F:

-55.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly higher than BZ=F's -13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ^IXIC has outperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of 14.21%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively lower -0.25% annualized return.


^IXIC

YTD

-1.03%

1M

13.61%

6M

0.02%

1Y

14.16%

5Y*

16.27%

10Y*

14.21%

BZ=F

YTD

-13.42%

1M

-0.08%

6M

-10.94%

1Y

-21.91%

5Y*

14.35%

10Y*

-0.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^IXIC vs. BZ=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IXIC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^IXIC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^IXIC is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BZ=F
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^IXIC vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXIC and BZ=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^IXIC vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, smaller than the maximum BZ=F drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and BZ=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^IXIC vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) is 7.89%, while Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that ^IXIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...